Question:
Hi Roger, we recently got a contract to supply an organization in
Germany which will require EDI. This would normally be no problem to us as we
have been doing EDI with our North American trading partners for over four
years; however, our new German contract requires us to use EDIFACT rather than
X12 as their preferred EDI standard. Could you highlight the main differences
between X12 and EDIFACT and suggest what I should do?
Answer: In 1979 the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) chartered the Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12
to develop uniform standards for inter-industry electronic exchange of business
transactions – now known commonly as Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). These
transaction sets, abbreviated to X12, are the predominant EDI standards used by
organizations in North America today.
In 1986, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) approved the acronym "UN/EDIFACT," which translates to United Nations Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport. UN/EDIFACT is an international EDI standard designed to meet the needs of both government and private industry. EDIFACT is the most popular worldwide EDI data standard outside of North America.
Here is a brief list of some of the different names given to documents in the X12 and EDIFACT transactions sets. You will notice that X12 assigns numeric values to documents whereas EDIFACT lists names or abbreviations.
TRANSACTION SET/DOCUMENT
|
X12 SET
|
EDIFACT
|
PRODUCT/PRICING TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Price
Sales Catalog
|
832
|
PRICAT
|
Price
Authorization Acknowledgement/Status
|
845
|
ATHSTS
|
Specification/Technical
Information
|
841
|
PRDSPE
|
Request
For Quotation
|
840
|
REQOTE
|
ORDERING TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Purchase
Order
|
850
|
ORDERS
|
Purchase
Order Acknowledgement
|
855
|
ORDRSP
|
Purchase
Order Change
|
860
|
ORDCHG
|
Purchase
Order Change Acknowledgement
|
865
|
ORDRSP
|
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Planning
Schedule/Material Release
|
830
|
DELFOR
|
Shipping
Schedule
|
862
|
DELJIT
|
Production
Sequence
|
866
|
--
|
Ship
Notice/manifest (ASN)
|
856
|
DESADV
|
SHIPPING/RECEIVING TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Shipment
Information (Bill of Lading)
|
858
|
IFTMCS
|
Receiving
Advice
|
861
|
RECADV
|
Non-conformance
Information-Disposition Transaction, Cause/Correction
|
842
|
NONCON
|
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Inventory
Inquiry/Advice
|
846
|
INVRPT
|
Product
Transfer and Resale Report
|
867
|
SLSRPT
|
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
|
||
Invoice
|
810
|
INVOIC
|
Freight
Invoice
|
859
|
IFTMCS
|
Payment
order/Remittance Advice (EFT)
|
820
|
REMADV
|
There are many differences between an X12 and an EDIFACT document and I would recommend that if you do not have the capabilities to do EDIFACT in house that you outsource to a strong global EDI solution provider who can handle both data formats. At B2BGateway, we have offices located in North America, Europe and Pacific/Asia regions and can handle all internationally recognized EDI data formats including not only X12 and EDIFACT but many, many more (Tradacoms in the UK for example).
For further information on B2Bgateway’s international data standards capabilities please visit www.B2BGateway.Net or call (401) 491 9595.
Roger Leyden is Director
of Global Business Development at B2BGateway.
No comments:
Post a Comment